Friday 29 August 2008

Urogenital Pain - Current Issues And Controversies

�BERKELEY, CA (UroToday.com) - Organized by the Pain of Urological Origin (PUGO) special interest radical of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), Glasgow, Scotland August 15-16, 2008.


PUGO held a 2 day meeting in Scotland prior to the IASP 12th World Congress on Pain to reckon the yesteryear, present and future of urogenital hurting. The target was to outline stream practice and have a look at what the future crataegus laevigata hold. Speakers from North America and Europe gave invited lectures, and synergistic sessions with all coming together attendees were interspersed passim the proceedings leading to very lively discussions. The organizing committee included: Andrew Baranowski from London, John Hughes from Middlesbrough, UK, Beverly Collett from Leicester, UK, Ursula Wesselmann from Birmingham, Alabama, Leroy Nyberg from Bethesda, MD, Richard Berger from Seattle, Curtis Nickel from Kingston, Ontario, and Paul Abrams from Bristol, UK. The meeting was tended to by a broad reach of specialists in bother medicine, anesthesiology, psychology, neurology, neurosurgery, urogenital medicine, gynecology, physical therapy, and internal medicine. Patient advocates were as well enthusiastic participants. Many first-class presentations were given, and this report can only highlight selected ones. The proceedings testament be synthesized by the organizing committee and module and a formal issue is plotted.


Curtis Nickel set the stage for the get together with a discussion on the failure of our traditional biomedical model to successfully empathise and do by urogenital inveterate pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS). He proposed a new schema in which an initiator leads to inflammation or tissue paper damage. In some patients this results in UCPPS and nates go on to develop into a regional painful sensation syndrome and/or become a part of a systemic pain syndrome. Likewise, a systemic or regional painful sensation syndrome tin result in UCPPS in some patients. He proposed a strategy in which we attempt to name the initiators, ameliorate the pain, treat the pelvic consequences of pelvic floor dysfunction, and tackle the associated phenotypes if diagnosed (irritable intestine syndrome, inveterate fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, etc.). He distressed the pauperism to name and treat cognitive modulators including depression and catastrophizing as considerably as helplessness.


Fred Howard from the University of Rochester spoke on the endometriosis hurting syndrome. Chronic pelvic pain in women is to the highest degree commonly of gastrointestinal origin followed by the urinary tract and finally the reproductive tract. Endometriosis is a histologic finding, non a syndrome per se. We don't know the percentage of patients with endometriosis world Health Organization also feature pelvic pain in the neck, nor do we live the pct of women with pelvic pain world Health Organization have adenomyosis. We don't understand how it causes pelvic pain in the neck, why removing lesions doesn't always death the painfulness, or wherefore similar symptoms are seen in patients with and without adenomyosis. The trinity of symptoms associated with endometriosis includes dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. This arse be referred to as the endometriosis pain syndrome. Dr. Howard quoted Frank Ling's report (Obstetrics and Gynecology, 93:51-58, 1999) showing the efficacy of depot leuprolide for chronic pelvic hurting in women suspected of having endometriosis, whether or not the diagnosis was borne kO'd on subsequent laparoscopy, a rather funny finding. Work by Sutton, Jones, and Abbott powerfully suggests that endometriosis lesions can cause pain and that surgical treatment is more effective than diagnostic laparoscopy in randomized, controlled trials (Fertility and Sterility, 62:696-700, 1994) (JSLS, 5:111-115, 2001) (Fertility and Sterility, 82:878-884, 2004).



Thibault Riant from Nantes, France related ground break surgical work in the treatment of the pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome (PNE) and the development of the Nantes criteria. The main criteria for diagnosing include all of the following: pain in the ass in the sensory orbit supplied by the pudendal nerve, nuisance never awakens the patients during the night, nuisance increases in the sitting position, no sensory deprivation is found, and an immediate decreasing of botheration is noted after a pudendal anesthetic block. Therapeutic blocks, aesculapian treatment, S2 transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, physical therapy, and oR were all discussed as possible forms of therapy. A multidisciplinary approach was suggested.



Maria Adele Giamberardino from the University of Chieti in Italy presented her research on the role of viscero-visceral hyperalgesia. Her studies, some in coaction with Karen Berkley in Tallahassee, Florida, addressed patients affected with urinary calculosis and igure in 20 class old South Korean males.


Bert Messelink from Groningen, the Netherlands, spoke on pelvic floor muscles and urogenital botheration. In patients with urogenital pain, the pelvic level muscles should be taken into account when talking and cerebration about causative factors and possible options for treatment. Pelvic floor muscle education, physical therapy, biofeedback, and treatment of myofascial trigger points were all discussed. Possible injectant of botulinum-A toxin or lidocaine into trigger points was mentioned, but information is sparse.


Eija Kalso from Finland spoke on opioids and guidelines for use in chronic pelvic pain, followed by another talk on drug therapy by Sam Chong from the United Kingdom. Dr. Kelso famous that in that location are no randomized trials or regular case reports regarding the use of opioids for chronic nonmalignant pelvic painfulness. Strong opioids should not be used as monotherapy, but rather as a part of a multidisciplinary approach. Use in combination with nonsteroidals and gabapentinoids may stay tolerance. An intravenous opioid trial may be a good negative predictor of whether to consider opioids in a particular affected role. Assessing timbre of life is decisive in deciding whether to continue opioids, as exceptional patients may find the diminished quality of liveliness they associate with the treatment is not balanced by whatever perceived pain benefit. Dr. Chong in agreement that using cocktails and combination anodyne therapy is usually better than monotherapy.


Tony Buffington from Columbus, Ohio opened the arcsecond day of the meeting. His presentation covered comorbidities, vulnerability factors, and inherited aggregation data. Specifically he discussed variable combinations of idiopathic chronic pain syndromes including bladder pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, excitable bowel syndrome, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as affective disorders such as post traumatic stress upset, panic disorder, anxiety and depression. These are unremarkably seen together in patients. They consist MUS or medically unexplained symptoms, and may involve up to 1/3rd of people quest medical attention. One campaigner underlying disorder is sensitizing of the central focus response system and an imbalance in its yield in reply to stressors. Enhanced sensitiveness may result from variable combinations of familial (genetic and environmental) factors. He hypothesizes that sensitization creates a greater vulnerability to life stressors, putting certain individuals at greater risk of infection of developing disorders characterized by pain sensation and uncomfortableness.


Andrew Baranowski presented the IASP classification system as it pertains to chronic pelvic bother, and renowned how it embeds description of many phenotypes that are currently felt to be critical in categorizing patients with chronic pain. A lively discussion with the audience and Dr. Nickels in particular ensued. Jose De Andres from Valencia, Spain then gave a detailed and captivating discussion on neuromodulation techniques, concentrating on the evolving field of sacral cheek root foreplay and spinal cord stimulant. He distressed that the level of evidence in this playing area is "small" and we are "but treating patients". He was followed by an graceful presentation from Dr. Karen Berkeley from the University of Florida detailing her research on mechanisms of pain in a gnawer model of endometriosis - and the relationship of pain from endometriosis to other conditions via pelvic cross-talk. Central sensitization, remote central sensitization, and cardinal hormonal modulation require a deliberate multifactorial approach to assessment and diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain.


Psychology and sexuality were the next topics. Anna Mandeville gave a introductory spill on the psychology of managing pain in the pelvis, highlighted by case presentations. She described several sexual "myths" including


a. sex is to be reserved for the perfect, or at least the healthy;

b. sexual urge must be spontaneous;

c. sexual urge always should lead to intercourse;

d. each partner should instinctively know what the other wants.


Melissa Farmer from McGill University in Montreal followed Dr. Mandeville with a fascinating word on "sexual pain". Dyspareunia is a pain syndrome, not a sexual disfunction. It requires biopsychosocial assessment and treatment. The inquiry she posed is, "Is pain intimate, or is sex sore?" In other words, does the painfulness occur in nonsexual or presexual situations. We would not say that frown back painful sensation is a "work disorder" simply because the patient says it interferes with work. Likewise, we should not define dyspareunia as a "sex disorder" because it interferes with sex. It is a pain in the ass disorder.


Dr. Farmer secondhand the term "provoked vestibulodynia" instead of vulvovestibulitis syndrome. She noted that there are no effective pharmacological treatments, and that cognitive/behavioral therapy, botheration management, pelvic floor physiatrics, and vestibulectomy are effectual in selected patients. Biomedical intervention (gynaecologist, pain specializer), psychosocial intervention (psychologist, sex activity therapist, shrink), and phsiotherapy are all parts of successful therapy. Reducing pain sensation does not always beggarly restoring sexual activity, nor does it necessarily spark advance to restoration of a relationship. Be careful how you delineate success in these patients.


Amanda C de C Williams from University College in London reviewed issue assessment. She noted that pain is rarely adequately measured by quality of life definitions, but quality of life often approximates more intimately than painfulness, symptom, or function measures what matters most to the patient, and moves the focus from disease or disfunction to the patient. She recommended falling somatization as being conceptually problematic, culturally specific, and incompatible with pain science. Likewise, cope may seem valid but is conceptually flawed. It addresses behaviour but not its context or final result. In a similar fashion, pain control condition predicts little, and is too general. Control may be an unrealistic aim for some pain.


The European Society for the Study of Interstitial Cystitis diagnostic coming was related to by Jorgen Nordling from Copenhagen, and served as a model for end organ specialist rating of a chronic pain syndrome. Tim Ness from Birmingham, Alabama illustrated how the botheration specialist approaches diagnosis.


Tier 1: rule out catastrophic processes;

Tier 2: evaluation that guides the natural selection of intervention;

Tier 3: evaluation to limit treatment toxicity (imaging, laboratory testing, behavioral assessment if controlled substances are to be employed);

Tier 4: longitudinal outcome judgment;

Tier 5: use therapeutic results to help find out diagnostic information.


This comprehensive meeting all over with a presentation by this newspaperman on practical considerations and algorithms for chronic pelvic pain, and also with a discussion led by Drs. Nickel and Baronowski to bring the comprehensive proceedings to a shut. It was agreed by all attendance that some type of clinical phenotype management strategy may help to move the field of force of treatment for chronic pelvic pain forward.


The management of chronic urogenital pain is a coordination compound, but evolving field. We need standardisation of sorting and rating. We besides need targeted therapies through a multidisciplinary approach, and finally, leslie Townes Hope for future benefits from translational science.


Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Philip M. Hanno, MD, MPH

UroToday - the only urogenital medicine website with original capacity written by global urogenital medicine key opinion leaders actively ed in clinical practice.


To access the latest urogenital medicine news releases from UroToday, go to:
www.urotoday.com


Copyright � 2008 - UroToday



More info

Tuesday 19 August 2008

Counselors Prepare To Assist Returning Servicemembers

�Almost hundred percent of American Counseling Association (ACA) members world Health Organization completed a Capella University survey on military mental health issues have taken action to increase their understanding of post-combat and re-entry issues of returning servicemembers. The results besides indicated that ACA appraise respondents feel better prepared to help oneself post-combat servicemembers than former mental health professionals wHO took the survey.

ACA members feel better fain to aid servicemembers


The ACA member results unwrap some interesting contrasts and parallels with other mental health professionals who took the survey. Highlights include (all statements refer to those wHO took the Capella University "Joining Forces America" military-mental health survey):


- Eighty-four pct of ACA members feel prepared to help post-combat servicemembers, compared to 61 percent of other genial health professionals.


- Nearly all ACA members (98 percentage) have taken at least one footfall to ameliorate their understanding of post-combat and reentry issues, compared to 75 percent of other mental health professionals.


- Neither ACA members nor other mental health professionals feel the mental health community as a whole is prepared to help oneself returning servicemembers. Seventy-three pct of ACA members and 64 pct of other mental wellness professionals aforementioned they trust the genial health community is non prepared.


- Only 6 per centum of ACA members said they had little or no cognition of post-combat psychological conditions, compared to 27 percentage of other mental health professionals.


"I'm not surprised with these results," aforementioned Richard Yep, CAE, administrator director of the ACA. "The genial health inevitably of reversive servicemembers and their families have been a strong focus of our organization for several years now. We've made a point of bringing this takings to our members' attention and are committed to helping provide counselors with the resources they need to address this growing challenge. We've offered multiple educational sessions on this topic at our conferences over the past several years, and also offer ongoing approach to publications and continuing education courses on our Web site. In addition, we have advocated for federal torah that testament provide military troops with greater access to mental health fear." One of ACA's 19 Divisions-the Association for Counselors and Educators in Government-represents counselors and educators in government and military related agencies.


"We're pleased to have ACA participation in this survey, and we applaud the many efforts they take made to focus attention on this issue," aforesaid Chris Cassirer, acting chief Executive of Capella University. "Like the ACA, Capella has a firm interest in the issue of military mental health because genial health professionals and military personnel represent two of our largest groups of students. We believe a big part of the challenge in meeting servicemembers' mental health needs is making sure there ar enough qualified professionals to address the need. Our online guidance and psychology programs-including the only online CAPREP-accredited master's-level counseling specializations-make it more than feasible to pursue advanced degrees in the mental health field."

Capella sponsors online conversation about this issue


To invite further conversation and bettor understanding of the mental health and re-entry issues of reversive troops, Capella University has created an online populace forum, hypertext transfer protocol://www.joiningforcesamerica.org, where anyone can contribute ideas and suggestions. A drumhead report of the Joining Forces America study is also available on the site.

About the Joining Forces America study


The study was sponsored by Capella University to research post-combat genial health and re-entry issues from the perspective of returning servicemembers and the mental health community, and to solicit ideas for what we as a society ass do to make post-combat transitions drum sander for returning servicemembers. Two separate simply similar follow instruments were used, 1 for servicemembers and one for mental health professionals.


The confidential servicemember survey was conducted online between May 27 and June 4, 2008. The appraise group consisted of Capella University adult students world Health Organization were connected with the military, including active servicemembers, veterans, and their immediate family members. Combat zone experience by the single or an immediate kinsperson member was required to participate in the survey. In add up, 238 participated as servicemembers/veterans and 11 participated as family members. The sampling size of the kin members was too small to be statistically reliable and their results ar not included in this report. For the purposes of this report, the term "servicemember" is used to study the combined responses of servicemembers and veterans.


The confidential mental health professional survey was conducted on-line between May 27 and June 8, 2008, among four groups: an online panel of 201 mental health professionals; 29 members of a military psychological science online give-and-take group; 1,064 Capella University grownup students and alumni world Health Organization were enrolled in or graduated from an in advance degree platform with a mental health, counseling, or psychology nidus; and 37 Capella University psychology and counseling faculty members. The reported results include the responses of the 999 survey participants in these four groups who identified themselves as working mental health professionals.


Additionally, members of the American Counseling Association were invited to complete the mental wellness professional appraise in the June 17, 2008, and July 1, 2008, editions of ACAeNews, an e-mail newsletter of the tie-up. Fifty-one ACA members completed the go over between June 17 and July 8, 2008. The initial survey respondents crataegus oxycantha or crataegus oxycantha not have also included ACA members. A copy of the revised review report with ACA results included is available by emailing MMHsurvey@capella.edu.

About the American Counseling Association


The American Counseling Association is a nonprofit, professional and educational system that is dedicated to the increment and enhancement of the counseling profession. Founded in 1952, ACA is the world's largest association exclusively representing professional counselors in various practice settings. By providing leaders training, publications, continuing education opportunities, and advocacy services to more than than 41,000 members, ACA helps counseling professionals develop their skills and expand their knowledge base.


ACA has been instrumental in mount professional and ethical standards for the counseling profession. The association has made considerable strides in accreditation, licensure, and national documentation. It as well represents the interests of the profession before u.S. Congress and federal agencies, and strives to promote recognition of professional counselors to the world and the media. For more information, please visit http://www.counseling.org or visit 800.347.6647.

About Capella University


Capella University is an accredited(a), fully on-line university that has reinforced its reputation providing quality graduate education for working adults. Eighty-three percent of Capella students are currently enrolled in master's or doctoral degree programs in business, info technology, didactics, human services, psychology, public health, and public safety. Capella besides offers bachelor's degree programs in patronage, information applied science, and public safety. Within those areas, Capella currently offers 109 graduate and undergraduate specializations and 15 certificate programs. More than 23,700 learners were enrolled as of June 30, 2008, from all 50 states and 45 other countries. Capella is committed to providing high-caliber cademic excellence and pursuing balanced business growth. Founded in 1993, Capella University is a wholly-owned subsidiary company of Capella Education Company, headquartered in Minneapolis. For more information, please visit http://www.capella.edu or call 1.888.CAPELLA (227.3552).


Learn more about Capella's services and scholarship for military-affiliated students: hTTP://www.capella.edu/armedforces or call 1.888.315.8001.


Learn more about Capella's graduate programs in the william Claude Dukenfield of direction and psychological science: http://www.capella.edu/mentalhealth.


(a)Capella University is licenced by The Higher Learning Commission and a member of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), http://www.ncahlc.org.


Capella University, 225 South Sixth Street, Ninth Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55402, 1.888.CAPELLA (227.3552).

Capella University


More info

Saturday 9 August 2008

Big Fuzz

Big Fuzz   
Artist: Big Fuzz

   Genre(s): 
Other
   



Discography:


Exercising the Demons   
 Exercising the Demons

   Year: 2004   
Tracks: 12